SAMPLE RIGHTS RECEIPT — See how RightsDocket turns an AI-assisted track into an HTML Rights Receipt, Signed Metadata, and a verification link for creators, managers, lawyers, labels, or distributors to review.
What you get in this sample
Rights Receipt
A plain-English summary of the track, AI involvement, human contribution, and review posture.
Review notes
The issues RightsDocket found: provider rules, release path, human contribution, and evidence gaps.
Signed Metadata
The supporting hashes, timestamps, file details, contribution notes, and verification materials that make the record reviewable.
Paid records include an HTML artifact, signed metadata, and a verification link.
RightsDocket/ HTML Rights Receipt · Signed Metadata- • 2 AI-generated elements that would otherwise read as human-authored
- • 2 contributor roles without documented scope
- • No clear explanation of human vs. AI-assisted material
Work Identification
Morning Coffee — Jingle
Readiness Checklist
Contributor Map
| Name | Role | Split | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abhishek Basu | Lyricist, Creative Director | 100% | human |
| Suno AI | Music Generation (instrumental, vocals, production) | — | ai |
AI Disclosure
Suno AI identified as generation tool. Usage scope: full instrumental and vocal generation from author-supplied lyrics.
Creative Decision Log
Timestamped evidence trail documenting human creative decisions for the review record.
Deterministic Claim Language Mapping
Why this language?
This language maps documented contributor roles to USCO-recognized categories: literary authorship (lyrics) and creative selection/arrangement. The iterative generation process establishes human creative control beyond mere prompting.
USCO Registration Guidance, 88 Fed. Reg. 16,190 (Mar. 16, 2023)
Why this language?
The USCO requires New Material Included to match Author Created. This field confirms what you are adding as new human-authored material — distinct from the AI-generated content you excluded above, which remains unclaimed under this filing.
USCO Registration Guidance, 88 Fed. Reg. 16,190 (Mar. 16, 2023)
Why this language?
The USCO requires disclosure of AI-generated material. All sonic elements generated by Suno are excluded because the AI system — not the human author — determined their specific expression.
USCO Registration Guidance — 'Material Excluded'; Part 2 Report (Jan. 2025)
Why this language?
This Note preempts common examiner questions by delineating human vs. AI contributions and establishing that the claimed elements reflect original creative expression under the Feist standard.
USCO Registration Guidance — supplemental explanation field
The USCO Limitation of Claim screen has 3 text fields and 2 checkboxes. RightsDocket maps each result through 4 Proof Pillars and deterministic rights logic — every branch tested against the 2023 USCO Registration Guidance, the 2025 Part 2 Report, and examiner correspondence patterns from Zarya of the Dawn and subsequent cases.
Paid exports package this reasoning into a reviewable record, not a generic fillable PDF.
Risk Flags & Filing Guidance
The USCO may ask how the author's selection of AI outputs constitutes sufficient creative expression. Document the number of outputs evaluated, the criteria used for selection, and any modifications made between generation cycles.
See Zarya of the Dawn (Reg. # VAu001480196) — USCO limited registration to selection/arrangement that was 'sufficiently creative.'
If this work will be commercially distributed, adding an ISRC strengthens the link between the claim and the distributed recording.
Best practice for works intended for commercial distribution.
Once your pack is generated, here's how it can support filing — review the fields carefully before submission.
Standard Application ($65 filing fee)AI-assisted works require the Standard Application to access Limitation of Claim fields. The $45 Single Application cannot be used.
- 1Log in to the eCO system at copyright.gov
- 2Select 'Register a New Claim' → 'Standard Application'
- 3In 'Author Created,' paste the text from Section 02 above
- 4In 'Limitation of Claim → Other,' paste the Material Excluded text
- 5In 'Note to Copyright Office,' paste the supplemental Note
- 6Upload your deposit copy (the audio file)
- 7Pay the $65 filing fee and submit
This sample record is not a live filing. In a live record, anyone with this link can verify the RightsDocket record without accessing your account.
In this sample, the supported WAV asset carries the embedded C2PA manifest. The Rights Receipt and review context live in the structured evidence record, not in the C2PA manifest.
This sample record was generated by RightsDocket's deterministic evidence, review, and verification workflow. It does not constitute a legal opinion. Registration decisions are made by the U.S. Copyright Office. The claim language in this report is rule-mapped from user inputs — it is not generated by a large language model.
Ready to build yours?
Start with a browser-local Free Rights Review, then decide whether you need a Rights Receipt or Human Proof Pack.